North Western Winds

Contemplating it all from the great Pacific Northwest

Meta Ethical Theories test

with 4 comments

Normally, I’d be concerned about being such an outlier on a quiz, but in this case I feel pretty good about it.

 

 

 

 

 

Intuitionist
You scored 75 Objectivism, 0 Naturalism, and 82 Cognitivism!
Many judges and much of the legal system is Intuitionist (as far as it goes, philosophically) in outlook to some degree.”Ethical intuitionism is usually understood as a meta-ethical theory that embraces the following theses:
1) Moral realism, the view that there are objective facts about value,2) Ethical non-naturalism, the view that these evaluative facts cannot be reduced to natural facts, and

3)the thesis that we sometimes have intuitive awareness of value, or intuitive knowledge of evaluative facts, which forms the foundation of our ethical knowledge.”

 
My test tracked 3 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:

free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 99% on Objectivism
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 99% on Naturalism
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 99% on Cognitivism

Link: The Meta-ethical Theories Test written by jacostyle on OkCupid Free Online Dating, home of the The Dating Persona Test

Technorati Tags:
, , ,

Advertisements

Written by Curt

January 29, 2007 at 9:16 pm

4 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. I think you’ve been goatsed. On the 3-variable chart, each cell appears as “free online dating.” What a low-life way to sneak an ad into someone’s blog … and right in the middle of the text!

    the forester

    January 31, 2007 at 7:05 am

  2. I was aware of it; I’ve seen other quizzes from this site. I decided to let this one ride. ‘Goatsed’ is a new one on me, though!

    Curt

    January 31, 2007 at 3:14 pm

  3. Don’t do too much research on the term “goatse” … trust me. You don’t want your eyeballs to melt out. I have no idea where people get images so foul.

    the forester

    January 31, 2007 at 3:49 pm

  4. Um, I see. 😉

    Curt

    January 31, 2007 at 9:30 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: