<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for North Western Winds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://northwesternwinds.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://northwesternwinds.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Contemplating it all from the great Pacific Northwest</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 08:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama on the Mount by the forester</title>
		<link>http://northwesternwinds.wordpress.com/2008/03/04/obama-on-the-mount/#comment-6238</link>
		<dc:creator>the forester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 02:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northwesternwinds.wordpress.com/?p=223#comment-6238</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Obama: "... an obscure passage in Romans.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ouch -- Obama's playing to people's ignorance of the Bible.

Romans is one of Paul's most systematic letters.  The "obscure passage" comes in the first chapter, right after the salutations.  Everything that comes later is predicated on the very reason Paul brought up homosexuality -- demonstrating humanity's sinfulness and need of salvation.  This is an obscure passage?

I was going to approach Obama with an open mind, but the willfulness of this spin will make me question anything he says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Obama: &#8220;&#8230; an obscure passage in Romans.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Ouch &#8212; Obama&#8217;s playing to people&#8217;s ignorance of the Bible.</p>
<p>Romans is one of Paul&#8217;s most systematic letters.  The &#8220;obscure passage&#8221; comes in the first chapter, right after the salutations.  Everything that comes later is predicated on the very reason Paul brought up homosexuality &#8212; demonstrating humanity&#8217;s sinfulness and need of salvation.  This is an obscure passage?</p>
<p>I was going to approach Obama with an open mind, but the willfulness of this spin will make me question anything he says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama on the Mount by gerard</title>
		<link>http://northwesternwinds.wordpress.com/2008/03/04/obama-on-the-mount/#comment-6233</link>
		<dc:creator>gerard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northwesternwinds.wordpress.com/?p=223#comment-6233</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;none written by their putative authors, all drawing on second - or third - or fourth hand accounts&lt;/i&gt;

No.  Really, do we have to denigrate the gospels in order to affirm the value and inspired nature of Paul's Epistles?

To be specific, people can and do dispute the authorship of all four gospels, but the traditional authors are strong and viable candidates.  Also see &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0802831621/ref=wl_it_dp?ie=UTF8&#38;coliid=I3OSD859RTKGN6&#38;colid=2S6SYIDAKDK58" rel="nofollow"&gt;Richard Bauckham's "Jesus &#38; the Eyewitnesses"&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>none written by their putative authors, all drawing on second - or third - or fourth hand accounts</i></p>
<p>No.  Really, do we have to denigrate the gospels in order to affirm the value and inspired nature of Paul&#8217;s Epistles?</p>
<p>To be specific, people can and do dispute the authorship of all four gospels, but the traditional authors are strong and viable candidates.  Also see <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0802831621/ref=wl_it_dp?ie=UTF8&amp;coliid=I3OSD859RTKGN6&amp;colid=2S6SYIDAKDK58" rel="nofollow">Richard Bauckham&#8217;s &#8220;Jesus &amp; the Eyewitnesses&#8221;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama on the Mount by uncutdiamond</title>
		<link>http://northwesternwinds.wordpress.com/2008/03/04/obama-on-the-mount/#comment-6232</link>
		<dc:creator>uncutdiamond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northwesternwinds.wordpress.com/?p=223#comment-6232</guid>
		<description>Interesting post...I never thought of the chronology of Paul as that important to understanding the people of the New Testament era. Not being a Biblical fundamentalist, I think it is important to have a sense of history about this confusing book. Good post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post&#8230;I never thought of the chronology of Paul as that important to understanding the people of the New Testament era. Not being a Biblical fundamentalist, I think it is important to have a sense of history about this confusing book. Good post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gold? by serega</title>
		<link>http://northwesternwinds.wordpress.com/2006/07/11/gold/#comment-6230</link>
		<dc:creator>serega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northwesternwinds.wordpress.com/2006/07/11/gold/#comment-6230</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama on the Mount by Jesse</title>
		<link>http://northwesternwinds.wordpress.com/2008/03/04/obama-on-the-mount/#comment-6229</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 01:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northwesternwinds.wordpress.com/?p=223#comment-6229</guid>
		<description>I'm not arguing religion, but Paul was right in the debate.
We have rejected the Theory of Just War.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not arguing religion, but Paul was right in the debate.<br />
We have rejected the Theory of Just War.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama on the Mount by lovefights</title>
		<link>http://northwesternwinds.wordpress.com/2008/03/04/obama-on-the-mount/#comment-6228</link>
		<dc:creator>lovefights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 01:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northwesternwinds.wordpress.com/?p=223#comment-6228</guid>
		<description>Mike Huckabee is the closest thing to a Christian politician in the American political presidential race.  The rest are not born-again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Huckabee is the closest thing to a Christian politician in the American political presidential race.  The rest are not born-again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows 3.1 Add Font Dialog Still In Vista by microsoft windows vista ultimate upgrade canada</title>
		<link>http://northwesternwinds.wordpress.com/2007/01/23/windows-31-add-font-dialog-still-in-vista/#comment-6225</link>
		<dc:creator>microsoft windows vista ultimate upgrade canada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 10:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northwesternwinds.wordpress.com/2007/01/23/windows-31-add-font-dialog-still-in-vista/#comment-6225</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;microsoft windows vista ultimate upgrade canada&lt;/strong&gt;

yes indeed...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>microsoft windows vista ultimate upgrade canada</strong></p>
<p>yes indeed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The future of text by the forester</title>
		<link>http://northwesternwinds.wordpress.com/2007/11/02/the-future-of-text/#comment-6126</link>
		<dc:creator>the forester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 12:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northwesternwinds.wordpress.com/2007/11/02/the-future-of-text/#comment-6126</guid>
		<description>Lately I am becoming more and more frustrated by &lt;i&gt;search&lt;/i&gt;, and turn to &lt;i&gt;browse&lt;/i&gt; where possible.  I'm not always satisfied to allow a computer algorithm to present what exists, because as Grafton points out, search misses things (and also turns up wholly irrelevant results).  Drilling into hand-picked categories often provides a survey of available information that reveals unexpected links and sources.  &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/dirhp" rel="nofollow"&gt;This approach&lt;/a&gt; may seem antiquated, but it's still enlightening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lately I am becoming more and more frustrated by <i>search</i>, and turn to <i>browse</i> where possible.  I&#8217;m not always satisfied to allow a computer algorithm to present what exists, because as Grafton points out, search misses things (and also turns up wholly irrelevant results).  Drilling into hand-picked categories often provides a survey of available information that reveals unexpected links and sources.  <a href="http://www.google.com/dirhp" rel="nofollow">This approach</a> may seem antiquated, but it&#8217;s still enlightening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Moral Philosophy Quiz by Idetrorce</title>
		<link>http://northwesternwinds.wordpress.com/2006/07/22/moral-philosophy-quiz/#comment-6054</link>
		<dc:creator>Idetrorce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 17:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://northwesternwinds.wordpress.com/2006/07/22/moral-philosophy-quiz/#comment-6054</guid>
		<description>very interesting, but I don't agree with you 
Idetrorce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very interesting, but I don&#8217;t agree with you<br />
Idetrorce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Trade easy pleasures&#8221; by http://www.empireunion.org/music.htm</title>
		<link>http://northwesternwinds.wordpress.com/2007/06/26/trade-easy-pleasures/#comment-6035</link>
		<dc:creator>http://www.empireunion.org/music.htm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northwesternwinds.wordpress.com/2007/06/26/trade-easy-pleasures/#comment-6035</guid>
		<description>Hi boys!dea5ff1cc138c52a811272101a72dbd0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi boys!dea5ff1cc138c52a811272101a72dbd0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
